By the time this is read, the flames of Baghdad may be cold; the bombing may have faded into memory.

By the time these words are heard or read by others, the war in Iraq may indeed be over. In this age, with the naked power of the United States military, there is no telling. It may be so. But if so, it can only be said to be an end to one war; there is little serious question but that it is the beginning of other wars.

It may be the precursor of other imperial wars, with laser-guided targets training their cold, green metallic sights on North Korea, or Iran, or Syria, or . . . ?

It may be that the adventure in Iraq has sparked other wars against other Western targets.

What is virtually certain is that this is not a war to stop other wars (remember World War I). Our parents and grandparents foolishly called it “The War to End War,” uh huh), but a war that will make the waging of more wars far more certain, and far less containable.

Once more, an Arab people have been humiliated by the West, under the propaganda fig leaf of “human rights.” We are assured, by the voices in the Pentagon, as well as the White House and their sycophants in the media, that this is a “War of Liberation.” Any honest student of history can cite a half dozen examples of foreign nations claiming to invade another nation for their own good, to “liberate” them. When the U.S. fought Spain for Cuba and Puerto Rico, they claimed the right to “liberate” it from Spanish cruelty. The U.S. wanted to make it into a colony in which to expand American slavery. Americans even supported an armed invasion of the island of Cuba, headed by a Cuban rebel and mercenary named Narciso Lopez, for whom they raised money and some 600 Americans (mostly Louisianans). Lopez and his supporters promised that at the time of the invasion a popular uprising would take place against the government. Lopez and his troop sailed to Cuba, and seized the town of Cardenas, burning the governor’s mansion. However, no uprising took place.

The Cubans apparently didn’t feel like being “liberated” by the American-backed Lopez, who, on the run from the Spanish Army, barely escaped. This was May 1850 (source: McPherson, James, Battle Cry of Freedom, (1988), p. 105).

Governments often offer up pretexts to cover the real reasons for war. Those who fight the wars, or even those who support the wars for patriotic reasons, rarely know the real reasons.

In this age of the Internet, and widening literacy, however, more and more people are able to pierce the veils of state propaganda, and therefore able to do the historical and economic research to perceive the real reasons behind the Iraqi Adventure.

The safest site in all of Iraq is most certainly the areas around the oil fields of Rumaila. What does that tell you?

This is not about “weapons of mass destruction”; it’s not about “liberating” Iraq; nor is it about bringing democracy to the Middle East. It’s about gaining the oil in the desert.

It’s about the expanded American Empire, which has no real competitor in the realm of military might. It’s about what Bush pere called, “The New World Order.” It’s about replacing corrupt rulers and dynasties, with more malleable, more tractable rulers, who will kneel to Washington when ordered to do so.

It’s about a New Colonialism ... a kinder, gentler, “democratic” colonialism.

There never was, in this world’s history, a kind, gentle rule of one people, over another people. Rome was feared; not loved. America is no different.

We are embarking on an ugly, long, and unpredictable path, for those who are already drunk with wealth and power. Our so-called Congress has already ceded its power to the President by granting him the power to wage war wherever he sees fit.

Those who claim to represent the People have ceded the most precious power a people have, the Power to Wage War, the Power of Life and Death, to a man who received less than a fourth of the nation’s votes. Yeah... this is a war for “democracy”—right?

---

—Copyright 2003, Mumia Abu-Jamal, March 25, 2003